No Poster

Why 1987

7 min📅 1987-01-01

Why (1987) is a poignant animated short that confronts the harsh realities of global inequality through the eyes of a starving infant in the developing world.

Director: Suzanne Dimant

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Why (1987) about?

Why (1987) follows the desperate plight of a starving infant in a third-world country, set against the backdrop of Harry Chapin's evocative song. The film uses minimalist animation to highlight the stark contrast between human suffering and societal indifference.

Who directed Why?

Why was directed by Suzanne Dimant, whose work in animation focuses on delivering powerful social messages through concise storytelling.

Who stars in Why?

Cast details for Why (1987) are not publicly listed.

Is Why (1987) worth watching?

Though unrated on IMDb, Why (1987) is a moving and thought-provoking animated short that stands out for its emotional depth and thematic weight. Its brevity makes it accessible, while its message lingers in the mind long after viewing.

How long is Why?

Why (1987) runs for 7 minutes.

About Why (1987) — A Stark Animated Short on Global Inequality

Why (1987) is a poignant animated short that confronts the harsh realities of global inequality through the eyes of a starving infant in the developing world. Directed by Suzanne Dimant, this seven-minute film blends stark visual storytelling with the haunting melody of Harry Chapin's song, creating an emotional resonance that lingers long after the credits roll. The atmosphere is one of quiet urgency, as Dimant's animation strips away distractions to focus squarely on the raw, unfiltered struggle of survival. Themes of poverty, helplessness, and societal indifference are woven into every frame, making it a compelling if difficult watch for audiences willing to engage with its heavy subject matter.

Despite its brevity, Why (1987) carries a powerful message about humanity's shared responsibility. The film's preservation by the Academy Film Archive in 2015 underscores its cultural significance, cementing its place as both an artistic statement and a historical artifact. While the cast remains uncredited, Dimant's direction ensures that the narrative remains the true focal point, leaving viewers with more questions than answers about the world we inhabit.